Recently Tiger Woods has been in the news quite a bit for his comments regarding women. He has attracted a lot of controversy due to statements he made during a press conference. During a deposition, Woods stated that he would not date a woman if she was not attractive. A reporter asked him why he did not say that he would date a woman if she was beautiful. He answered, “Because no one will be able to outsmart me.” A tournament review of Tiger Woods reveals some interesting facts about this controversy.
Some may wonder how anyone could outsmart Tiger Woods. Tiger is known for his mental skills. Many critics say that Tiger is so smart that he does not have to use physical tactics to win. This is a controversial statement because some players argue that you need to use physical tactics to play against Tiger. Golf Digest takes a look at how Tiger responds to adversity in golf.
The author examines some of Tiger’s quotes concerning relationships and golfing. It seems that Tiger does indeed have great skills when it comes to mental preparation. He is always looking to improve on things. However, the author contends that some of the criticism he has received is unwarranted. There are plenty of reasons to doubt what others think.
The author examines some of the questions that will be asked at tournaments. Many spectators are curious to know what Tiger is going to say. The author also reviews some of the games that Woods has played in the past few months. It becomes obvious that Woods is not afraid of competition. In fact, he enjoys playing against other players.
The author of a Golf Digest article takes a close look at what went on at the recent PGA Championship. It appears that although Woods was not the best player, he was still a contender for the trophy. It is amazing to see how many people are ready for Tiger to win the trophy even though he did not play his best. A golf tournament is a competition, and one person’s loss may be someone else’s gain.
Golf Digest also examines how much good analysis Woods has provided over the years. The author contends that analysis may have been overstated. However, Tiger has certainly provided plenty of fodder for sports radio and television shows over the last several months. The author of the golf Digest article admits that he does not know whether Tiger actually does read his golf articles. He does admit, however, that he pays close attention to them.
The author of the article maintains that Tiger has improved because he has spent more time on practice. Perhaps this is true. Nevertheless, we cannot know for sure until we can watch Tiger play again. Until then, we can rely on golf analysis to help us make up our minds.
The author of a golf article makes a valid point when he argues that we should not base our opinions of a player on golfing reports. We must take the word of the professionals who play the game. After all, they are more likely to have played Tiger Woods than any of us. Whether or not Tiger will improve as he plays more golf, or whether he will continue to struggle is really a question of opinion and reading rather than numbers on a report card.
The author contends that the information provided by golf analysts is biased. That is, it is provided by those who benefit from the coverage. How many times have you seen a professional golfer admit that he did not play his best game in a tournament because he was feeling ill. How many times have you seen an analyst say that it was not good to play Tiger in a tournament because he had a bad back? These are the voices heard in the golf echo chamber when you read about someone who is perceived as having played better than he actually has. In other words, the opinions are based on opinion, and what might be seen as a flaw in Tiger’s game is really more of an observation, based on nothing more substantial than a lack of available data.
Golf Digest magazine has a long standing history of providing good solid golf advice to its readers. Tiger is just another example of that. It appears that many of the people writing in the golf digest section of this publication have never actually played the great player. They obviously have no real experience playing the game, and are therefore writing from a perspective of someone who has very little knowledge of the game. It is not the fault of Tiger Woods, but the fault of these writers, who obviously don’t want to try their luck on the tour, and so they’re obviously writing from the position of not being able to play like Tiger.
A good golf analysis will give you ideas for improved techniques, strategies, and tips for improving your game. If you don’t like the advice given in a particular article, or you don’t agree with the overall approach taken with that article, you should not read it. You shouldn’t see the articles as gospel truth. Rather, you should view the golf advice offered in such golf articles as guides or hints, rather than gospel truth. By doing this, you’ll be much better off in your game.